Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

NO1 [K

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO1 [K

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig NO1 [K

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 represents an ancestral stage within the NO branch of the broader K2 paternal lineage. In the Y-chromosome phylogeny, it is an intermediate clade that connects the deeper K2 ancestry with the descendant lineages N and O, two of the most geographically significant Y-DNA branches in Eurasia.

The origin of NO1 is best placed in north Eurasia during the Upper Paleolithic, roughly 45 thousand years ago. Because it sits near the root of the N/O split, NO1 is usually interpreted as part of the deep population structure of northern Eurasian hunter-gatherers before later climatic shifts and demographic expansions reshaped the continent. Direct ancient DNA evidence for NO1 itself is limited, but its phylogenetic position strongly supports an origin in a broad northern Eurasian context rather than in later East or Southeast Asian farming populations.

Subclades

NO1 is not usually discussed as a widely sampled present-day haplogroup in its own right; instead, it is important primarily as an ancestral node leading to two major descendant branches:

  • Haplogroup N: A major paternal lineage strongly associated with northern Eurasia, Siberia, and later Uralic-speaking populations.
  • Haplogroup O: A major East and Southeast Asian paternal lineage that reached very high frequencies in many populations of China, Southeast Asia, and Island Southeast Asia.

Because NO1 is an intermediate ancestral clade, its significance lies less in present-day frequency and more in its role in the early diversification of one of the most consequential paternal lineages in Eurasian prehistory.

Geographical Distribution

NO1 itself is expected to have been present among ancient northern Eurasian populations. Its descendant lineages later expanded far beyond the ancestral range:

  • Northern Eurasia and Siberia through haplogroup N
  • East Asia through haplogroup O
  • Southeast Asia through downstream O subclades
  • Uralic-associated populations in northern Europe and western Siberia through N-derived lineages

In modern population genetics, NO1 is best understood as a phylogenetic ancestor rather than a common contemporary haplogroup. Its legacy is visible through the broad and highly successful distribution of its descendant clades.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The historical importance of NO1 comes from the deep population history it represents. The split between N and O reflects a major early diversification event in Eurasian paternal ancestry, likely predating the spread of agriculture and the rise of historical ethnolinguistic groups.

Haplogroup N later became strongly associated with northern Eurasian foraging and forest-zone populations, and in many regions it is linked to the spread of Uralic languages and to movements across Siberia and northeastern Europe. Haplogroup O became one of the dominant paternal lineages of East Asian and Southeast Asian agricultural societies, including populations shaped by the demographic expansions of early farming systems in China and adjacent regions.

Thus, NO1 is culturally significant not because it is itself tied to a single archaeology culture, but because it stands near the ancestral node behind two very large and historically important paternal expansions.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is a deep ancestral lineage within the NO branch of K2 and an important marker of early northern Eurasian paternal diversification. Although it is not commonly observed as a widespread modern haplogroup, it is central to understanding the origins of the major descendant lineages N and O, which profoundly shaped the genetic history of northern Eurasia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis NO1 [K. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 NO1 [K Aktuell ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 NO1 [ ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 NO1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 41 0
4 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 haplogroup NO1 is found include:

  1. Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying ancestral NO-related lineages
  2. Siberian populations, especially those associated with downstream haplogroup N diversity
  3. East Asian populations, especially through the later expansion of haplogroup O
  4. Southeast Asian populations where haplogroup O reached high frequencies
  5. Uralic-associated populations in northern Eurasia through descendant N lineages

Regionale Präsenz

East Asia Moderate
Southeast Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Siberia / Northern Asia Low
Northern Europe Low
South Asia Low
Northeastern Asia Moderate
Southeastern Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~50k Jahre zurück

    Jungpaläolithikum

    Fortgeschrittene Werkzeuge, Kunst und kulturelle Vielfalt

  2. ~45k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe NO1 [K

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  4. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  5. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  6. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  7. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  8. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig NO1 [K

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu NO1 [K. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_Sitaimengguying_EN Early Buryat Lena River Culture Lokomotiv Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N Shamanka Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.